Corrections and Data Disputes

Corrections AltHarbor has published

Each entry states what changed, when it changed, and, where one was recorded, the source the change was checked against. Entries do not identify who requested a correction. A value changing because a fund filed something new is not a correction; these are changes AltHarbor made because what it had published was wrong. This list is compiled from AltHarbor’s change history and maintained by hand rather than generated, so it may not capture every correction.

1. Aug 18, 2026 · K-PEC

   Ten K-PEC financial-highlights rows carried the wrong fiscal year. The FY2025 annual report presents five fiscal years side by side, and the reading of that table placed values from the wrong column under a period ending 31 December 2024: six share classes showed the 2023 closing net asset value per share, two showed the 2025 closing value, and two showed a net asset value of zero where the source cell was blank. The correct 2024 figures, taken from the FY2024 annual report, were already held separately and were not affected. The ten incorrect rows have been withdrawn, and Class D and Class S now show no 2024 figure until that year is read from its own annual report.

   Checked against: Migration 20260818075949 kpec_highlights_column_misalignment_retire. Values checked against KKR Private Equity Conglomerate LLC Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filing 568) and the FY2024 Form 10-K (filing 3902).

2. Aug 16, 2026 · REIT

   Brookfield REIT’s net asset value was recorded one thousand times too high for the thirteen months from November 2021 through November 2022. The thousand-fold scale was removed from seventy-seven stored figures. A separate source-cell review later withdrew one invalid Class T row from display. The displayed class figures agree with the filed totals. Net asset value per share was not affected by the scale correction.

   Checked against: Brookfield Real Estate Income Trust Form 10-K 0001713407-22-000027 for the year ended 31 December 2021, and monthly net-asset-value Current Reports on Form 8-K from November 2021 through November 2022. A read-only review on 22 August 2026 confirmed the published values and found that their source-fact values still need the write-blocked repair recorded in issue 2511.

3. Aug 16, 2026 · CPEP

   CPEP’s June 2026 cash-flow summary showed a unit-redemption payment as a distribution. A redemption returns cash to an investor who exits. It is not a distribution to holders. The filing did not report a distribution, so the distributions figure is now empty.

   Checked against: Carlyle Private Equity Partners Fund, L.P. Form 10-Q 0002065337-26-000040 for the period ended 30 June 2026, statement of cash flows.

4. Aug 16, 2026 · PGPE

   Six PGPE tender records showed each repurchase offer size as total units outstanding. The stored figure is the 5 per cent offer expressed in units. The figure is now in the units-offered field. The units-outstanding field is empty because the source does not provide that value.

   Checked against: Partners Group Private Equity Fund Schedule TO-I filings for offers that closed from 24 February 2025 through 26 May 2026. A read-only review on 22 August 2026 confirmed the published values and found that six source-fact keys still need the write-blocked repair recorded in issue 2480.

5. Aug 16, 2026 · ACI

   ACI reports one combined realised-and-unrealised gain per share for March 2026. Three share-class rows had labelled that combined value as unrealised gain only. The value now has its combined meaning. A separate fee-waiver dash had been stored as zero. It is now empty because the filing did not report a number.

   Checked against: Ares Core Infrastructure Fund Form 10-Q 0002031750-26-000032 for the period ended 31 March 2026, financial highlights and statement of operations.

6. Aug 15, 2026 · ACI

   Ares Core Infrastructure Fund’s distribution history carried 24 rows for the first half of 2026 that describe events that did not happen as recorded. Each collapsed the declaration, ex-dividend and payment dates into a single date, and each showed the same $0.2083 per share for every share class, when the fund’s own quarterly report shows the classes receiving different amounts — $0.19022 for Class S against $0.20830 for Class I in the same month. Half of them cited a report filed months before the distributions they described. Four claimed distributions for Class N, a class that did not begin selling shares until 1 May 2026. Nine were straightforward duplicates of correctly recorded rows, so those months were counted twice. All 24 were removed and eleven correctly dated rows were added from the June 2026 quarterly report, giving twenty distributions for the half-year whose dollar amounts total $104.8 million — the same figure the fund states in its own statement of changes in net assets. The removed rows are preserved in an archive table.

   Checked against: Ares Core Infrastructure Fund Form 10-Q 0002031750-26-000064 for the period ended 30 June 2026, Part I Item 2 “Distributions” and Note 10.

7. Aug 15, 2026 · SPRING

   StepStone Private Venture and Growth Fund’s valuation breakdown was wrong for four reporting periods between September 2023 and March 2025, in two separate ways. Every dollar figure had been multiplied by a thousand, so a fund holding roughly $250 million of investments was shown holding $244 billion. And the largest category — investments the fund values using the manager’s own net asset value rather than a market price, which is most of what it owns — had been left out of the totals entirely, so even at the right scale the totals would have been short. Both are now read directly from each shareholder report: total investments of $212.5 million at September 2023, $429.0 million at March 2024, $867.5 million at September 2024, and $1.84 billion at March 2025. The Level 2 category, which those reports show as a dash rather than a number, is now recorded as “not stated” instead of zero.

   Checked against: StepStone Private Venture and Growth Fund shareholder reports on Form N-CSRS 0001213900-23-093935 and 0001213900-24-105796 and Form N-CSR 0001213900-24-050293 and 0001213900-25-052666.

8. Aug 15, 2026 · OSCF, HLEND, BCRED

   Each of these funds publishes a monthly net-asset-value press release that rounds — “approximately $4.3 billion”, “approximately $42.8 billion”, figures to the nearest $0.1 million. For 30 June 2026 the rounded release arrived first and was recorded, and the quarterly report that followed states the same figures exactly. AltHarbor was showing a rounded number for a date where the exact one is on file. Every affected figure now comes from the quarterly report: OSCF net assets $4,277,644,000 in place of $4,300,000,000, HLEND $12,049,588,000 in place of $12,049,600,000, and BCRED $42,775,600,000 in place of $42,800,000,000, with each fund’s portfolio fair value corrected the same way. Net asset value per share did not change for any of the three. BCRED’s three share classes also gained the class-level net assets the press release never disclosed, and they add to the fund total to the dollar. The superseded figures are kept in the change history rather than discarded.

   Checked against: Oaktree Strategic Credit Fund Form 10-Q 0001872371-26-000013, HPS Corporate Lending Fund Form 10-Q 0001628280-26-056772, and Blackstone Private Credit Fund Form 10-Q 0001803498-26-000048, each for the period ended 30 June 2026.

9. Aug 14, 2026 · Blackstone Private Equity Strategies Fund L.P. (BXPE)

   AltHarbor's nine fund-level GAAP net asset values for BXPE, covering 2024-03-31 through 2026-03-31, recorded the net assets of BXPE US Aggregator (CYM) L.P. The correct entity is the registrant, Blackstone Private Equity Strategies Fund L.P. ("BXPE U.S."), whose units investors hold and whose per-class values AltHarbor already recorded. The Aggregator is the pooled vehicle the registrant holds a proportional interest in — 82.0% at December 31, 2025 — so its net assets are larger than the registrant's and are shared with other feeders. Each of the nine values was re-read from that period's own SEC filing. The corrected figure for each period equals the sum of that period's per-class net assets plus the $250,000 General Partner Interest, exactly. At December 31, 2025 the recorded value changed from $12,306,373,000 to $9,897,485,000. The correction also removes an apparent decline between March 31, 2026 and June 30, 2026 that was an entity difference rather than a change in net assets.

   Checked against: Blackstone Private Equity Strategies Fund L.P. Statements of Assets and Liabilities, Total Net Assets, in each of the nine period filings (FY2024 and FY2025 10-K; Q1/Q2/Q3 10-Q for 2024, 2025 and Q1 2026)

10. Aug 14, 2026 · REIT

    The first REIT June 2026 filing load treated some filed dashes as zero, used several wrong note labels, omitted current-period segment, joint-venture, equity, debt and distribution detail, and labeled generated values as filing-reported evidence. The reviewed load preserves filed-dash status, adds the missing period detail, corrects the affected classifications and values, and replaces generated evidence with filing-cell or explicit derivation records.

    Checked against: Brookfield Real Estate Income Trust Form 10-Q 0001713407-26-000079 for the period ended 30 June 2026.

11. Aug 14, 2026

    Net asset value is not one measure. A non-traded BDC reports audited net assets under US GAAP; a non-traded REIT publishes an appraised valuation NAV that can be more than twice its GAAP equity; several private-equity vehicles publish a transactional NAV they strike shares at. All three were stored in one column with nothing saying which was which, so a reader could compare a REIT’s appraised NAV against a BDC’s GAAP NAV as though they were the same number. Every stored row now states its own basis, and the six rows removed on 12 August were restored and labelled rather than deleted. Displayed figures did not change: the site continues to show the GAAP measure where a fund publishes both.

    Checked against: Each fund’s own filings for the periods concerned, including BREIT’s annual report reconciling US GAAP stockholders’ equity of $22,801,849 thousand to a published net asset value of $54,278,418 thousand at 31 December 2025.

12. Aug 12, 2026 · TPOP, BXPE

    Six month-end net-asset-value rows carried a transactional NAV — the price a fund transacts at, which its own filings say may differ from net asset value determined under US GAAP — in a column that means audited GAAP net assets. A change computed across those rows against the quarter-end rows either side of them was not a real change. The six rows were removed on 12 August 2026 and restored two days later under a revised rule; see the following entry.

    Checked against: TPOP and BXPE monthly net asset value current reports on Form 8-K for 31 May 2026 and 28 February 2026, read against each fund’s quarterly report balance sheet.

13. Aug 8, 2026 · SREIT, BREIT, ADCF, OTIC, OCIC, HLEND, ADS, ASIF, BCRED, GCRED

    On the fund liquidity page, a filed tender acceptance rate was read as a fraction when it is stored as a percentage, so every window with a filed rate of 1% or more was displayed as “100% honored”. Seventy-five windows across ten funds were affected, including windows where only 3% of requests were accepted. The same page counted a window with no filed acceptance rate as filled in full, because that count was derived by subtraction rather than measured. Both are corrected: a filed rate now displays as filed, and a window with no filed rate is reported as having none.

    Checked against: The proration factors as filed in each fund’s tender-offer documents and annual reports; the corrected display agrees with them.

14. Jul 16, 2026 · PPEXX

    A duplicated performance row created a share class that does not exist in the fund’s filings (“Class I”; the fund labels its classes numerically). The share-class picker selected it and displayed a stale 6.51% one-year return as of 30 September 2025 instead of Class 1’s 8.35% as of 31 March 2026. The duplicate row was removed and its evidence re-pointed to the real class.

    Checked against: N-CSRS 0001193125-25-311162, Class 1 per-class performance.

15. Jul 11, 2026 · SREIT, OCIC

    Filed repurchase proration factors were stored in two different units, so some windows were displayed at one hundred times their true value — a window where 55.3% of requests were accepted was shown as “5530.0% accepted” on the homepage exit-pressure module and the redemption-pressure tracker. The stored values were normalised to whole percent and every reader routed through one converter.

    Checked against: The proration factors as filed in each fund’s tender-offer documents and annual reports.

16. Apr 20, 2026 · JPMorgan Private Markets Fund (JPMF)

    JPMF is a closed-end Delaware statutory trust that conducts discretionary tender offers, not Rule 23c-3 interval repurchases. The SEC N-CSRS describes periodic offers by the Fund to repurchase shares from shareholders.

    Checked against: N-CSRS Note 1 Organization and Note 6 Capital Shares; EDGAR filing history