Skip to main content
Back to controlled examples

Hypothetical liquidity window versus client cash need

Use a hypothetical liquidity window to show what happens when requests exceed stated capacity.

Case routeConcept to tool to document check to advisor language.
3Checks4Concepts2Tools2Outputs

Inspect This Model

Use the scenario to isolate the mechanic.

Use MODEL-CREDIT-LIQUIDITY to move from Repurchase program, to controlled lab, to document-route check, to advisor language.
Mechanic in focus

Repurchase program

Use a hypothetical liquidity window to show what happens when requests exceed stated capacity.

Controlled educational example. Not based on any specific fund.

Inspection workflowConcept to lab to document route to advisor language.
  1. 01Concept
    Define the mechanic

    Start with the canonical Repurchase program entry so the model scenario is read through the right mechanic.

    Repurchase program
  2. 02Tool
    Run the controlled lab

    Show proration, deferred demand, and why a stated cap is not the same as a guaranteed exit.

    Liquidity Simulator
  3. 03Document route
    Find the document family

    Repurchase policy, prospectus liquidity section, tender documents, and accepted-versus-requested results.

    Repurchase program model scenario
  4. 04Controlled example
    Inspect the model scenario

    Hypothetical repurchase cap and cadence. Accepted versus requested amounts in the model window. Board discretion or suspension language.

    MODEL-CREDIT-LIQUIDITY scenario
  5. 05Advisor output
    Leave with usable language

    Use when a fund has repurchase pressure, a partial fill, or a client asks what happens when requests exceed capacity.

    Manager questions

Concept Graph

The canonical terms this example teaches.

Related Tools

Run the controlled lab before using the scenario language.

Related Modules

Read the background if the example exposes a gap.

Learning Paths

Use this case inside a broader advisor workflow.

Wrapper Context

Compare the structure before comparing performance.

Controlled examples2 model scenarios

Connect this example to model document checks.

The scenario shows the event, math, simplified filing-style language, and advisor interpretation without using live fund rows.

Inspection workflow
  1. Start with the definition and source checklist.
  2. Model the mechanic in the related tool or simulator.
  3. Inspect the model scenario, fill math, and generic document family.
  4. Open the controlled example or advisor output when the mechanic changes the explanation.
Private CreditMODEL-CREDIT-LIQUIDITYOpen scenario
Repurchase program / 43% model fill

Hypothetical liquidity window with oversubscription

The model window shows how a stated repurchase program can deliver partial liquidity when requests exceed capacity.

Window close
31 Mar 2026
Fill rate
43%
Accepted amount divided by requested amount
Cap applied
5% NAV
Accepted / requested
$50M / $116M
Private EquityMODEL-PE-TENDEROpen scenario
Proration / Tender-offer window

Model tender window with partial exit risk

The model tender cycle separates a scheduled exit process from daily liquidity and shows where proration language belongs.

Offer window
Quarterly model cycle
Offer cap
3% NAV
Demand pressure
2.4x
Unfilled handling
Resubmit next window

Advisor Outputs

Leave with language, questions, and document checks.

Controlled educational example. Not based on any specific fund. Product pages remain the place where AltHarbor applies these mechanics to source-backed product facts.